DEFINITION OF NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
The definition of natural environment based on the dictionary here at my residence, is the exterior settings in which a plant, creature, or individual lives that is inclined to impact it's progression and tendencies. This consists of the atmosphere, waters, vitamins and minerals, creatures, and any exterior element influencing a given living thing or individual at any given time. So as individuals our normal setting is anything that is around us. The oxygen we take in, in wind form it would be a tornado or hurricane. The soil or grass we wander on. The definition of environment may read different based upon which dictionary you are working with, But the definition of natural environment really should have the same fundamental ideal no matter where you get it from. visit for more Saman Ghazizadeh.
ENVIRONMENTALISM
Environmentalism is the act of assisting to sustain, restore, or enhance one's natural environment by reducing air pollution, preserve natural resources, do away with things that impact the globe adversely like technological innovation. The cause is the world and how to conserve the the planet. Some ways are approaching issues such as global warming, the depletion of the ozone layer, and the danger of trans-boundary pollution from nuclear mishaps. Hence, an environmentalist is an promoter of environmentalism. Evidently the following is how environmentalists are viewed.
THE TECHNICALLY INSANE
From the mouth of the technically advanced…There is a significant menace facing mankind. The threat is not from acid rain, global warming, polluting of the environment, or the logging of rain jungles, as us environmentalists would have people believe. They claim the danger to humankind is from environmentalism. The essential concerns of environmentalists are not fresh oxygen and fresh water; rather it is the decline of industrial culture. Our purpose is not the advancement of personal well being, individual pleasure, and individual lifestyle; rather they claim that we are a subhuman group in which mother nature is bowed down to like some historical God. Visit for more Saman Ghazizadeh.
If the best of mankind were the target of environmentalists, then we are told that we would accept the market and engineering that have wiped out the illnesses, plagues, pestilence, and famines that brought death and destruction preceding the Industrial Revolution. And that we would accept free enterprise and technological innovation as the only solution to the relatively minimum risks that now exist— insignificant in comparison to the dangers of existing in a non-technological community.
In a country established on the founder spirit, we are told that we have made "advancement" an uncomfortable thought, attacking the man-made as an infringement on fantastic mother nature. We prohibit or avert the advancement of Alaskan petroleum, foreign drilling, atomic power—and every other practical type of power. In the name of "conserving mother nature," we challenge the quality of living and force our nation to be reliant upon madmen like Saddam Hussein. Hmm Is this true? Do environmentalists have the planets best interests at heart? I think we do. Property, enterprise, and work opportunities are given up to spotted owls and snails. Health-related research is given up to the "rights" of mice. Logging is given up to the "rights" of timber. No example of the progress which released man from the cave is safe from the onslaught of those of us who are "protecting" the environment from man, who we consider a rapist by his very essence.
Where does this stuff come from? Does this world really view environmentalists this way. We just want the earth to be around for our grand children, and great grand children and that needs a proactive approach.visit for more Saman Ghazizadeh.
Saman Ghazizadeh
The definition of natural environment based on the dictionary here at my residence, is the exterior settings in which a plant, creature, or individual lives that is inclined to impact it's progression and tendencies. This consists of the atmosphere, waters, vitamins and minerals, creatures, and any exterior element influencing a given living thing or individual at any given time. So as individuals our normal setting is anything that is around us. The oxygen we take in, in wind form it would be a tornado or hurricane. The soil or grass we wander on. The definition of environment may read different based upon which dictionary you are working with, But the definition of natural environment really should have the same fundamental ideal no matter where you get it from. visit for more Saman Ghazizadeh.
ENVIRONMENTALISM
Environmentalism is the act of assisting to sustain, restore, or enhance one's natural environment by reducing air pollution, preserve natural resources, do away with things that impact the globe adversely like technological innovation. The cause is the world and how to conserve the the planet. Some ways are approaching issues such as global warming, the depletion of the ozone layer, and the danger of trans-boundary pollution from nuclear mishaps. Hence, an environmentalist is an promoter of environmentalism. Evidently the following is how environmentalists are viewed.
THE TECHNICALLY INSANE
From the mouth of the technically advanced…There is a significant menace facing mankind. The threat is not from acid rain, global warming, polluting of the environment, or the logging of rain jungles, as us environmentalists would have people believe. They claim the danger to humankind is from environmentalism. The essential concerns of environmentalists are not fresh oxygen and fresh water; rather it is the decline of industrial culture. Our purpose is not the advancement of personal well being, individual pleasure, and individual lifestyle; rather they claim that we are a subhuman group in which mother nature is bowed down to like some historical God. Visit for more Saman Ghazizadeh.
If the best of mankind were the target of environmentalists, then we are told that we would accept the market and engineering that have wiped out the illnesses, plagues, pestilence, and famines that brought death and destruction preceding the Industrial Revolution. And that we would accept free enterprise and technological innovation as the only solution to the relatively minimum risks that now exist— insignificant in comparison to the dangers of existing in a non-technological community.
In a country established on the founder spirit, we are told that we have made "advancement" an uncomfortable thought, attacking the man-made as an infringement on fantastic mother nature. We prohibit or avert the advancement of Alaskan petroleum, foreign drilling, atomic power—and every other practical type of power. In the name of "conserving mother nature," we challenge the quality of living and force our nation to be reliant upon madmen like Saddam Hussein. Hmm Is this true? Do environmentalists have the planets best interests at heart? I think we do. Property, enterprise, and work opportunities are given up to spotted owls and snails. Health-related research is given up to the "rights" of mice. Logging is given up to the "rights" of timber. No example of the progress which released man from the cave is safe from the onslaught of those of us who are "protecting" the environment from man, who we consider a rapist by his very essence.
Where does this stuff come from? Does this world really view environmentalists this way. We just want the earth to be around for our grand children, and great grand children and that needs a proactive approach.visit for more Saman Ghazizadeh.
Saman Ghazizadeh
No comments:
Post a Comment